Trophic ecology of neonates and juveniles of the silky shark, Carcharhinus falciformis, off the coast of Guerrero, Mexico
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The silky shark, Carcharhinus falciformis, is one of the most important shark species in the small-scale fishery landings on the Pacific coast of Mexico. In the present work, we report the main food components of C. falciformis caught by small-scale fisheries in Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico, according to size (neonates and juveniles) and sex (males and females), as well as reporting the niche breadth and trophic level. A total of 165 stomachs of C. falciformis were collected, of which 57 contained food and 108 were empty. A total of 11 prey groups were identified: 4 crustaceans, 3 fish, 2 cephalopods, 1 sea turtle, and 1 bird. According to the prey-specific index of relative importance (%PSIRI), crustaceans accounted for 77.17% of the diet. The crab Portunus xantusii was the most important component of the diet of neonates, juveniles, males, and females. The diets did not show great differences between neonates and juveniles and between males and females (Morisita–Horn index: 0.86 and 0.80, respectively). The silky shark presented a narrow niche breadth in all categories, indicating a specialist-type feeding strategy (Levin’s index <0.60). According to Amundsen’s model, C. falciformis showed preference for P. xantusii. The trophic level determined for C. falciformis indicated that it is a secondary predator.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which allows you to share and adapt the work, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Figures, tables and other elements in the article are included in the article’s CC BY 4.0 license, unless otherwise indicated. The journal title is protected by copyrights and not subject to this license. Full license deed can be viewed here.
Metrics
References
Alejo-Plata C, Gómez-Márquez JL, Ramos S, Herrera E. 2007. Presencia de neonatos y juveniles del tiburón martillo Sphyrna lewini (Griffith & Smith, 1834) y del tiburón sedoso Carcharhinus falciformis (Müller & Henle, 1839) en la costa de Oaxaca, México = Presence of neonates and juveniles of the hammerhead shark Sphyrna lewini (Griffith & Smith, 1834) and the silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis (Müller & Henle, 1839) off the coast of Oaxaca, Mexico. Rev Biol Mar Ocean. 42(3):403–413. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-19572007000300020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-19572007000300020
Allen GR, Robertson DR. 1994. Fishes of the Tropical Eastern Pacific. Honolulu (HI): University of Hawaii Press. 332 p.
Amundsen PA, Gabler HM, Staldvik FJ. 1996. A new approach to graphical analysis of feeding strategy from stomach contents data—modification of the Costello (1990) method. J Fish Biol. 48(4):607–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb01455.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb01455.x
Barría C, Coll M, Navarro J. 2015. Unravelling the ecological role and trophic relationships of uncommon and threatened elasmobranchs in the western Mediterranean Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 539:225–240. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11494
Barría C, Navarro J, Coll M. 2018. Feeding habits of four sympatric sharks in two deep-water fishery areas of the western Mediterranean Sea. Deep Sea Res Part I. 142:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2018.09.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2018.09.010
Bizzarro JJ, Robison HJ, Rinewalt CS, Ebert DA. 2009. Comparative feeding ecology of four sympatric skate species off central California, USA. Environ Biol Fish. 84(2):241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-008-9428-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-008-9428-5
Bonfil R. 2008. The Biology and Ecology of the Silky Shark, Carcharhinus falciformis. In: Pikitch TJ, Camhi MD, Pikitch EK, Babcock EA (eds.), Sharks of the Open Ocean: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. -05995-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302516.ch10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302516.ch10
Bornatowski H, Navia AF, Braga RR, Abilhoa V, Correa MFM. 2014. Ecological importance of sharks and rays in a structural foodweb analysis in southern Brazil. ICES J Mar Sci. 71(7):1586–1592. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu025
Borrell A, Cardona L, Kumarran RP, Aguilar A. 2011. Trophic ecology of elasmobranchs caught off Gujarat, India, as inferred from stable isotopes. ICES J Mar Sci. 68(3):547–554. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsq170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsq170
Bowen SH. 1996. Quantitative description of the diet. In: Murphy BR and Willis DW (eds.), Fisheries Techniques, 2nd ed. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society. p. 513–532.
Brown SC, Bizzarro JJ, Cailliet GM, Ebert DA. 2012. Breaking with tradition: redefining measures for diet description with a case study of the Aleutian skate Bathyraja aleutica (Gilbert 1896). Environ Biol Fish. 95(1):3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9959-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9959-z
Cabrera-Chávez-Costa AA, Galván-Magaña F, Escobar- Sánchez O. 2010. Food habits of the silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis (Müller & Henle, 1839) off the western coast of Baja California Sur, Mexico. J Appl Ichthyol. 26(4):499– 503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01482.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01482.x
Calle-Morán MD, Galván-Magaña F. 2020. Diet composition and feeding habits of the pelagic thresher shark Alopias pelagicus in Eastern Central Pacific Ocean, Ecuadorian waters. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 100(5):837–845. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315420000569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315420000569
Castro JI. 1996. The sharks of North American waters. Texas (USA): Texas A&M University Press. 180 p. Clothier CR. 1950. A key to some southern California fishes based on vertebral characters. Fish Bull. 79:1–83.
Cohen JE, Pimm SL, Yodzis P, Saldana J. 1993. Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. J Anim Ecol. 62(1):67–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/5483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/5483
Colwell RK. 2009. EstimateS 8.2.0: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. User’s Guide and Application. Storrs (CT): Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut.
Colwell RK, Futuyma DJ. 1971. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology. 52(4):567–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1934144
Compagno LJV. 1984. Catálogo de especies: Tiburones del mundo. Un catálogo anotado e ilustrado de especies de tiburones conocidas hasta la fecha. Parte 1, Hexanchiformes a Lamniformes = Species catalog: Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 1, Hexanchiformes to Lamniformes. Vol. 4. Roma (Italy): FAO. p. 1–25.
Compagno LJV, Ebert DA, Smale MJ. 1989. Guide to the sharks and rays of southern Africa. London (UK): New Holland (Publ.) Ltd. 158 p. Cortés E. 1999. Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks. ICES J Mar Sci. 56(5):707–717. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0489
Cortés E, Gruber S. 1990. Diet, feeding habits and estimates of daily ration of young lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris (Poey). Copeia. 1990(1):204–218. https://doi.org/10.2307/1445836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1445836
Costello MJ. 1990. Predator feeding strategy and prey importance: a new graphical analysis. J Fish Biol. 36(2):261–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05601.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05601.x
Cousins SH. 1980. A trophic continuum derived from plant structure, animal size and a detritus cascade. J Theor Biol. 82(4):607–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(80)90181-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(80)90181-2
Duffy LM, Olson RJ, Lennert-Cody CE, Galván-Magaña F, Bocanegra-Castillo N, Kuhnert PM. 2015. Foraging ecology of silky sharks, Carcharhinus falciformis, captured by the tuna purse-seine fishery in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Mar Biol. 162:571–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2606-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2606-4
Estupiñán-Montaño C, Pacheco-Triviño F, Cedeño-Figueroa LG, Galván-Magaña F, Estupiñán-Ortiz JF. 2017. Diet of three shark species in the Ecuadorian Pacific, Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinus limbatus and Nasolamia velox. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 98(4):927–935. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002531541600179X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002531541600179X
Fischer W, Krupp F, Schneider W, Sommer C, Carpenter KE, Niem CH. 1995. Guía FAO para la identificación de especies para los fines de la pesca = FAO Guide for the Identification of Species for Fishing Purposes. Roma (Italy): FAO. p. 1–1813.
Flores-Martínez IA, Torres-Rojas YE, Galván-Magaña F, Ramos- Miranda J. 2016. Diet comparison between silky sharks (Carcharhinus falciformis) and scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini) off the south-west coast of Mexico. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 97(2):337–343). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315416000424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315416000424
Froese R, Pauly D. 2015. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. Stockholm (Sweden): FishBase; accessed 2016 Nov 10. http://www.fishbase.org
Gotelli NJ, Hart EM, Ellison AM. 2014. EcoSimR (Version. 0.1.0, R Package). [Place unknow]: Gotelli Lab; accessed 2019 August 4. https://github.com/GotelliLab/EcoSimR/issues
Hayden B, Palomares MLD, Smith BE, Poelen JH. 2019. Biological and environmental drivers of trophic ecology in marine fishes-a global perspective. Sci rep. 9:11415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47618-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47618-2
Heithaus MR, Frid A, Vaudo JJ, Worm B, Wirsing AJ. 2010. Unravelling the ecological importance of elasmobranchs. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds.), Shark and Their Relatives II. 1st ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group. p. 611–637. ISBN-13: 978-1420080476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420080483-c16
Heithaus MR, Vaudo JJ, Kreicker S, Layman CA, Krützen M, Burkholder DA, Gastrich K, Bessey C, Sarabia R, Cameron K, et al. 2013. Apparent resource partitioning and trophic structure of large-bodied marine predators in a relatively pristine seagrass ecosystem. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 481:225–237. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10235
Hernández-Aguilar SB, Abitia-Cárdenas LA, Moreno-Sánchez XG, Arrellano Martínez M, González-Rodríguez E. 2012. Trophic spectrum of the sailfish Istiophorus platypterus caught off Acapulco in the southern Mexican Pacific. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 93(4):1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315412001622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315412001622
Horn HS. 1966. Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. Am Nat. 100(914):419–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/282436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/282436
[IUCN] International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-2. [Place unknown]: IUCN; accessed 2019 Oct 7. https://www. iucnredlist.org
Iverson LK, Pinkas L. 1971. A pictorial guide to beaks of certain eastern Pacific cephalopods. California Department of Fish and Game. Fish Bull. 152:83–105.
Jiménez-Valverde A, Hortal J. 2003. Las curvas de acumulación de especies y la necesidad de evaluar la calidad de los inventarios biológicos = Species accumulation curves and the need to assess the quality of biological inventories. Rev Ibé Arac. 8:151–161.
Kessler WS. 2006. The circulation of the eastern tropical Pacific: A review. Prog Oceanogr. 69(2–4):181–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.03.009
Krebs CJ. 1999. Ecological methodology. 2nd ed. Menlo Park (CA): Addison Wesley Longman. 620 p.
Labropoulou M, Eleftheriou A. 1997. The foraging ecology of two pairs of congeneric demersal fish species: importance of morphological characteristics in prey selection. J Fish Biol. 50(2):324–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01361.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01361.x
Langton RW. 1982. Diet overlap between Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, silver hake, Merluccius bilinearis, and fifteen other northwest Atlantic finfish. Fish Bull. 80:745–759.
Lowe CG, Wetherbee BM, Crow GL, Tester AL. 1996. Ontogenetic dietary shifts and feeding behavior of the tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier, in Hawaiian waters. Environ Biol Fish. 47:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005044
McElroy WD, Wetherbee BM, Mostello CS, Lowe CG, Crow GL, Wass RC. 2006. Food habits and ontogenetic changes in the diet of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in Hawaii. Environ Biol Fish. 76:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9010-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9010-y
Menni RC, Lucifora LO. 2007. Condrictios de la Argentina y Uruguay. ProBiota, FCNyM, UNLP, Serie Técnica-Didáctica. Argentina. 11:1–15.
Myers RF. 1999. Micronesian reef fishes: a comprehensive guide to the coral reef fishes of Micronesia, 3rd revised and expanded edition. Barrigada (Guam): Coral Graph. 330 p.
Navia AF, Cruz-Escalona VH, Giraldo A, Barausse A. 2016. The structure of a marine tropical food web, and its implications for ecosystem-based fisheries management. Ecol Mod. 328:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.02.009
Palacios-Salgado DS, Ramírez-Valdez A, Rojas-Herrera AA, Granados-Amores J, Melo-García MA. 2014. Marine fishes of Acapulco, Mexico (Eastern Pacific Ocean). Mar Biodiv. 44:471–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-014-0209-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-014-0209-4
Pauly D, Zeller D. 2015. Sea Around Us: concepts, design and data. [Place unknown]: Sea Around Us; accessed 2018 Jan 01. http:// www.seaaround.org
Pittenger GG. 1984. Movements, distributions, feeding, and growth of the Pacific angel shark, Squatina californica off Santa Barbara, California. Copeia. 1986:987–994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1445296
Rosas-Luis R, Navarro J, Loor-Andrade P, Forero MG. 2017. Feeding ecology and trophic relationships of pelagic sharks and billfishes coexisting in the central eastern Pacific Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 573:191–201. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12186
Ruíz-Pérez NE, Cerdenares-Ladrón de Guevara G, López-Herrera DL, Altamirano-Ramírez IR. 2016. Relaciones tróficas entre cinco especies de peces pelágicos que cohabitan en las costas de Oaxaca, México = Trophic interactions between five pelagic fish species cohabiting in the coast of Oaxaca, Mexico. Hidrobiológica. 26(1):77–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcbs/hidro/2016v26n1/Cardenares
Schaefer K, Fuller D, Castillo-Geniz JL, Godinez-Padilla CJ, Dreyfus M, Aires-da-Silva A. 2021. Post-release survival of silky sharks (Carcharhinus falciformis) following capture by Mexican flag longline fishing vessels in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Fish Res. 234:105779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105779
Smith EP, Zaret TM. 1982. Bias in estimating niche overlap. Ecology. 63(5):1248–1253. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1938851
Soberón-M J, Llorente-B J. 1993. The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Cons Biol. 7(3):480–488. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030480.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030480.x
Wolff GA. 1982. A beak key for eight eastern tropical Pacific cephalopods species, with relationship between their beak dimensions and size. Fish Bull. 80(2):357–370.