Abundance of coccoid cyanobacteria, hydrographic parameters and the possible underestimation of in situ chlorophyll a in the northern gulf of California and the Mexican California Current
Main Article Content
Abstract
The abundance of coccoid cyanobacteria was counted within the euphotic zone at a station in Delfín Basin, in the northern Gulf of California, and at a station in the California Current, off Todos Santos Bay, during 1993. The abundance of cyanobacteria at both stations was between 107 and 108 cells L–1. Comparison with other concomitantly sampled parameters, i.e., irradiance, temperature, nutrients and chlorophyll a, showed no significant correlation with the cyanobacterial abundance. The contribution of cyanobacteria to the total in situ chlorophyll a concentration was calculated using the cyanobacterial abundance, an average published value of 1.0fgChl a cell–1 and a reduced pigment extraction efficiency in cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria contributed, in half of the cases, more than 10% and more than 4% of the total chlorophyll in Delfín Basin and the California Current, respectively. Again, this relative contribution was not related to the other concomitantly measured in situ parameters. In Synechococcus (WH-7803) cultures, the cellular chlorophyll a concentration was measured after extraction by soaking the samples in different solvents: 90% acetone and dimethylsulfoxide/acetone/water (DMSO/acetone). The cellular chlorophyll of WH-7803 extracted with DMSO/acetone was a factor of 1.9 times higher than the cellular chlorophyll concentration extracted with 90% acetone without sonication. Assuming that only the cyanobacteria would yield higher chlorophyll concentrations with DMSO/acetone extraction, then the chlorophyll a concentrations measured with 90% acetone extraction without sonication underestimated, in half of the cases, the real concentrations of in situ chlorophyll a by more than 5% in the northern Gulf of California and more than 2% in the California Current.
Downloads
Article Details
This is an open access article distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which allows you to share and adapt the work, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Figures, tables and other elements in the article are included in the article’s CC BY 4.0 license, unless otherwise indicated. The journal title is protected by copyrights and not subject to this license. Full license deed can be viewed here.