Tiempo de retención y capacidad de transporte de los remolinos del noroeste del golfo de México
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Los remolinos son estructuras transitorias que influyen en gran medida en la circulación promedio del océano. Modifican la distribución de masa y propiedades como calor, sal, clorofila y partículas inertes. La capacidad que tienen los remolinos para transportar propiedades o partículas depende de su capacidad de retención. En este estudio se identificaron y caracterizaron los remolinos de mesoescala del noroeste del golfo de México (NOGM) a través de un método lagrangiano que permite evaluar el tiempo de retención y la fracción de masa que pueden retener y transportar. Para el análisis, se utilizaron datos diarios de altimetría de 1993 a 2016. En el periodo de estudio se detectaron un total de 254 remolinos, 73 anticiclones y 181 ciclones. Se identificó una región (94.75º W, 26.75º N) donde ocurren ~30% del total de los remolinos ciclónicos detectados entre las isóbatas de 1,000 y 2,500 m. En promedio, el radio de los remolinos fue de ~40 km para la isobata <1,000 m y ~70 km para la isobata >2,500 m. Los remolinos de mesoescala del NOGM pueden trasportar ~60% de la masa que contenían al momento de ser detectados. En promedio, el transporte de masa ocurrió por 33 d para los ciclones y por 26 d para los anticiclones. Rara vez ocurrió por 60 d o más.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Este es un artículo de acceso abierto distribuido bajo una licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, que le permite compartir y adaptar el trabajo, siempre que dé el crédito apropiado al autor o autores originales y la fuente, proporcione un enlace a Creative Commons licencia, e indicar si se realizaron cambios. Las figuras, tablas y otros elementos del artículo están incluidos en la licencia CC BY 4.0 del artículo, a menos que se indique lo contrario. El título de la revista está protegido por derechos de autor y no está sujeto a esta licencia. La escritura de licencia completa se puede ver aquí.
Métrica
Citas
Abernathey R, Haller G. 2018. Transport by Lagrangian vortices in the eastern Pacific. J Phys Oceanogr. 48(3):667–685.
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0102.1
Andrade-Canto F, Sheinbaum J, Zavala-Sansón L. 2013. A Lagrangian approach to the Loop Current eddy separation. Nonlinear Proc Geoph. 20(1):85–96.
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-85-2013
Beron-Vera FJ, Olascoaga MJ, Goni GJ. 2008. Oceanic mesoscale eddies as revealed by Lagrangian coherent structures. Geophys Res Lett. 35(12):L12603.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033957
Beron-Vera FJ, Olascoaga MJ, Haller G, Farazmand M, Triñanes J, Wang Y. 2015. Dissipative inertial transport patterns near coherent Lagrangian eddies in the ocean. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. 25(8):087412.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928693
Beron-Vera FJ, Wang Y, Olascoaga MJ, Goni GJ, Haller G. 2013. Objective detection of oceanic eddies and the Agulhas Leakage. J Phys Oceanogr. 43(7):1426–1438.
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-12-0171.1
Biggs DC, Fargion GS, Hamilton P, Leben RR. 1996. Cleavage of a Gulf of Mexico loop Current eddy by a deep water cyclone. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 101(C9):20629–20641.
https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC01078
Cetina-Heredia P, Roughan M, van Sebille E, Keating S, Brassington GB. 2019. Retention and leakage of water by mesoscale eddies in the East Australian Current System. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 124(4):2485–2500.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014482
Chelton DB, Gaube P, Schlax MG, Early JJ, Samelson RM. 2011a. The influence of nonlinear mesoscale eddies on near-surface oceanic chlorophyll. Science. 334(6054):328–332.
https://10.1126/science.1208897
Chelton DB, Schlax MG, Samelson RM. 2011b. Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies. Prog Oceanogr. 91(2):167–216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.01.002
Condie S, Condie R. 2016. Retention of plankton within ocean eddies. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 25(10):1264–1277.
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12485
Dong C, Liu Y, Lumpkin R, Lankhorst M, Chen D, McWilliams JC, Guan Y. 2011. A scheme to identify loops from trajectories of oceanic surface drifters: An application in the Kuroshio Extension region. J Atmos Ocean Tech. 28(9):1167–1176.
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05028.1
d’Ovidio F, De Monte S, Della-Penna A, Cotté C, Guinet C. 2013. Ecological implications of eddy retention in the open ocean: a Lagrangian approach. J Phys A: Math Theor. 46(25):254023.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/25/254023
Elliott BA. 1982. Anticyclonic rings in the Gulf of Mexico. J Phys Oceanogr. 12(11):1292–1309.
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1982)0122.0.CO;2
Haller G, Hadjighasem A, Farazmand M, Huhn F. 2016. Defining coherent vortices objectively from the vorticity. J Fluid Mech. 795:136–173.
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.151
Hamilton P. 1992. Lower continental slope cyclonic eddies in the central Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 97(C2):2185–200.
https://doi.org/10.1029/91JC01496
Hamilton P. 2007. Eddy statistics from Lagrangian drifters and hydrography for the northern Gulf of Mexico slope. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 112(C9):C09002.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003988
Hamilton P, Berger TJ, Johnson W. 2002. On the structure and motions of cyclones in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 107(C12):3208.
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC000270
Hamilton P, Lee TN. 2005. Eddies and jets over the slope of the northeast Gulf of Mexico. In: Sturgers W, Lugo-Fernandez A (eds.), Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico: Observations and Models. Vol. 161, Geophysical Monograph Series. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union. p. 123–142.
https://doi.org/10.1029/161GM010
Hamilton P, Fargion GS, Biggs DC. 1999. Loop Current eddy paths in the western Gulf of Mexico. J Phys Oceanogr. 29(6):1180–1207.
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1999)0292.0.CO;2
Leben RR. 2005. Altimeter-derived Loop Current metrics, in Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico: Observations and Models. In: Sturges W, Lugo-Fernandez A (eds.), Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico: Observations and Models. Vol. 161, Geophysical Monograph Series. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union. p. 181–202.
https://doi.org/10.1029/161gm15
Le Vu B, Stegner A, Arsouze T. 2018. Angular momentum eddy detection and tracking algorithm (AMEDA) and its application to coastal eddy formation. J Atmos Ocean Tech. 35(4):739–762.
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0010.1
Lipphardt BL, Poje AC, Kirwan AD, Kantha L, Zweng M. 2008. Death of three Loop Current rings. J Mar Res. 66(1):25–60.
https://doi.org/10.1357/002224008784815748
Lobel PS, Robinson AR. 1988. Larval fishes and zooplankton in a cyclonic eddy in Hawaiian waters. J Plankton Res. 10(6):1209–1223.
https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/10.6.1209
Merrell WJ Jr, Morrison JM. 1981. On the circulation of the western Gulf of Mexico with observations from April 1978. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 86(C5):4181–4185.
Merrell WJ Jr, Vázquez AM. 1983. Observations of changing mesoscale circulation patterns in the western Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 88(C12):7721–7723.
https://doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC12p07721
Meunier T, Pallás-Sanz E, Tenreiro M, Portela E, Ochoa J, Ruiz-Angulo A, Cusí S. 2018. The vertical structure of a Loop Current eddy. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 123(9):6070–6090. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jc013801
Nowlin WD Jr, Jochens AE, Reid RO, DiMarco SF. 1998. Texas– Louisiana shelf circulation and transport processes study: synthesis report. Vol. 2, Appendices. New Orleans (LA): US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Services, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region. 502 p. OCS Study, MMS 98-0036.
Oey LY, Ezer T, Lee HC. 2005. Loop Current, rings and related circulation in the Gulf of Mexico: A review of numerical models and future challenges. In: Sturges W, Lugo-Fernandez (eds.), Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico: Observations and Models. Vol. 161, Geophysical Monograph Series. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union. p. 31–56.
https://doi.org/10.1029/161GM04
Ohlmann JC, Niiler PP. 2005. Circulation over the continental shelf in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Prog Oceanogr. 64(1):45–81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2005.02.001
Ohlmann JC, Niiler PP, Fox CA, Leben RR. 2001. Eddy energy and shelf interactions in the Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 106(C2):2605–2620.
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC000162
Okubo A. 1970. Horizontal dispersion of floatable particles in the vicinity of velocity singularities such as convergences. Deep Sea Res Oceanogr Abstr. 17(3):445–454.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(70)90059-8
Sánchez-Velasco L, Lavín MF, Jiménez-Rosenberg SPA, Godínez VM, Santamaría-del-Angel E, Hernández-Becerril DU. 2013. Three-dimensional distribution of fish larvae in a cyclonic eddy in the Gulf of California during the summer. Deep Sea Res Part I. 75:39–51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2013.01.009
Smith LC, Smith M, Ashcroft P. 2011. Analysis of environmental and economic damages from British Petroleum’s Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Albany Law Review. 74(1):563–585.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1653078
Tenreiro M, Candela J, Sanz EP, Sheinbaum J, Ochoa J. 2018. Near-surface and deep circulation coupling in the western Gulf of Mexico. J Phys Oceanogr. 48(1):145–161.
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0018.1
Vidal VMV, Vidal FV, Hernández AF, Meza E, Zambrano L. 1994. Winter water mass distributions in the western Gulf of Mexico affected by a colliding anticyclonic ring. J Oceanogr. 50(5):559–588.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02235424
Vidal VMV, Vidal FV, Pérez-Molero JM. 1992. Collision of a Loop Current anticyclonic ring against the continental shelf slope of the western Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 97(C2):2155–2172.
https://doi.org/10.1029/91JC00486
Wang Y, Beron-Vera FJ, Olascoaga MJ. 2016. The life cycle of a coherent Lagrangian Agulhas ring. J Geophys Res: Oceans. 121(6):3944–3954.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011620
Wang Y, Olascoaga MJ, Beron-Vera FJ. 2015. Coherent water transport across the South Atlantic. Geophys Res Lett. 42(10):4072–4079.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064089
Weiss J. 1991. The dynamics of enstrophy transfer in two-dimensional hydrodynamics. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 48:273–294.
https:doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(91)90088-Q
Zavala-Hidalgo J, Romero-Centeno R, Mateos-Jasso A, Morey SL, Martínez-López B. 2014. The response of the Gulf of Mexico to wind and heat flux forcing: What has been learned in recent years? Atmósfera. 27(3):317–334.